...
In my previous editorial I wrote about changes planned for the Journal and promised the continued commitment to its main mission, namely to be a bridge between practitioners and researchers.
Here is the manifestation of that promise. As you can see there are some changes to the Journal’s appearance, and we hope you like its more modern look. There are also significant developments in the content, most notably in the variety of articles published.
In this issue you will find two major academic research papers with intriguing results and managerial implications. There is a fascinating case study, an industry research project, an interview with a leader in the sponsorship field and a book review. We aim to keep this healthy mix, and the publisher and I would like to hear from you if you have any criticisms (or even compliments) about the direction of the Journal.
Since the announcement of the new publisher, I have had many calls and e-mails asking about policy, review process and types of material featured. Here are responses to the most frequently asked questions:
Has the review process changed?
No, there is no change. All academic research manuscripts will be subject to a blind review by three reviewers. Other material, such as case studies and interviews, will be subject to at least one review. Where a paper has been subject to the full peer-review process, this will be indicated.
What types of contributions is the journal looking for?
Priority is given to solid research-based contributions. However, as is evident in this issue, we are looking to other types of material that will help the Journal serve as a bridge between academia and practice. Case studies, commercial research, best practice analysis, opinion pieces and book reviews are all welcome.
I am not sure if my manuscript is appropriate for the Journal. Can I send you an abstract or description?
By all means send in what you have. I am here to help you present and publish your work. The earlier you let us know what you are doing or planning to do, the better we can help you steer it in the right direction for the Journal. We might also point you to a company that can supply data or other support.
I am not sure that my research is sports marketing or sports sponsorship…
I define sports marketing broadly as the use of sports to achieve marketing objectives (rather than defining it as the marketing of sports). This opens the Journal to a wide variety of topics, from the use of sports celebrities to sports advertising, from sports merchandising research to sports memorabilia collection, from brand building using sport to the development of the sports brand. Equally, the Journal is interested in sponsorship research relating to the arts, education and so on.
Do you look for reviewers?
Yes, we always need people dedicated to the subject. Send me your resume and indicate the type of manuscript you are comfortable to review.
In which format should I submit my manuscript?
See page 2 or visit submit paper. We would like to hear from you and find out how we can make the Journal a better tool for you. I look forward to receiving your best material and working with you to see it through to publication.
David Shani, PhD